"It uses cryptography" doesn't magically make something more secure either; it must serve a specific purpose, and be an effective solution for that specific purpose.
Hi , How to invalidate a session when user closes the browser?
The session framework lets you store and retrieve arbitrary data on a per-site-visitor basis.
It stores data on the server side and abstracts the sending and receiving of cookies.
When people recommend JWT, they usually claim one or more of the following benefits: , when you make the transition.
It's just not worth it to implement JWT upfront, especially considering the downsides that I'll get to later. You will have to deal with session management yourself, on both the client and the server side, whereas standard session cookies , and this is no different from how JWT works.
Additionally, the local-memory cache backend is NOT multi-process safe, therefore probably not a good choice for production environments.
can not only generate falsified session data, which your site will trust, but also remotely execute arbitrary code, as the data is serialized using pickle.
Warning Immediate session deletion may cause unwanted results.A MAC (Message Authentication Code) is used to protect the data against changes by the client, so that the session data will be invalidated when being tampered with.destroys all of the data associated with the current session.I've published a new post with a slightly sarcastic flowchart - please have a look at it before suggesting a solution. At the end of this article, I'll briefly go into those other usecases. In this particular article, I will be comparing sessions to JWT tokens, and occasionally go into "cookies vs.
A lot of people mistakenly try to compare "cookies vs. This comparison makes no sense at all, and it's comparing apples to oranges - cookies are a vs. Local Storage" as well where it makes sense to do so.
When there is concurrent requests, other connections may see sudden session data loss. Requests from Java Script and/or requests from URL links.